I consider myself to be extremely careful about consuming poisons after nearly 40 years of dealing with metals toxicity, but when it came to buying a coffee maker I went right back to my old habits, never considering toxicity.  Although I did do extensive research, health was not a consideration until a savvy friend reminded me about the plastic parts in coffee makers and the dangers they can hold.  Even with the reminder, I failed to do the right research.  

I bought a $300 unit, hoping for the best when it came to the use of plastic parts.  Then, as soon as I opened the box, there it was, right inside the lid was the California Proposition 65 warning.  

If you are not from California you might not have heard of Proposition 65 and even if you are from California it may mean little to you.  Prop. 65, as it is called, involves higher standards for products and materials than the FDA requires.  This means that the amounts of poisons and toxicity is reduced if goods are sold in the State or it must carry a warning.  It is law only in California, but because manufacturers do not want to produce two types of goods, they often upgrade or tag all of their goods to comply with California law.  

The Prop. 65 warning on my new coffee maker says out loud, “Buy at Your Own Risk.”  Even though the FDA thinks you will be fine, the State of California does not.  Meeting California requirements does not mean that the item is non-toxic.   It means only that the levels of toxicity have been lowered below the federal regulations.  The warning itself tells you that the product exceeds even California limits.  Truthfully, neither set of regulations will keep you as safe as it should.

So what does the warning apply to in the world of coffee makers?  It is yet, unknown.  I wrote the manufacturer to ask precisely what aspect of the machine do not comply with California law.  It is not easy to get an answer to such a question and will likely take days or weeks for a response.  If you go this route, the response needs to be in writing.  If you are told that the manufacturer complies with all FDA regulations, you are in trouble.  That is completely unsatisfactory and to a metals contaminated person, that answer is as good as a no.  

Instead of waiting for the response, I’m making the grown up decision to return my luxury coffee maker because my health is a priority.  After years of illness, why would I intentionally put 2 to 4 cups of poison into my body each and every day?

If you are shopping, consider a few of these highlights of the decision making process.  All plastic parts contain toxicity.  This includes those plastic pods for single cup coffee makers.  Many will say they are BPA free and that is good because BPA is a known carcinogen.  The problem is that BPA was replace with a formula change and who knows what is in the replacement.  Heating plastic allows the toxicity to leach, so 180 degrees on plastic every day of your life might not be a great idea…even though everyone else is doing it.

Another concern is aluminum.  There is really no aluminum product that is fit for food service.  That includes aluminum foil and cans.   You are just giving Alzheimer’s the greatest of opportunities.

Then there is the issue of bacteria that can grow in coffee makers.  It never occurred to me, but it did to my savvy friend who knew that water lines can grow mold.  Then there are all of those dark, warm and wet spots that can easily harbor bacteria.  As it turns out there are studies that say your coffee pot and your bathroom might tie for bacteria growth.

Finally, there is coffee itself.  You really don’t need a dose of pesticide each and every day even if you are the picture of health.  Organic beans are the start of a safe cup of coffee.  

The options seem to be stainless steel and lead-free glass.  That means pour over models, presses and percolators.  
​No bells.  No whistles.

  

If your metals poisoning
​was from dentistry, a decision about what to do
after amalgam removal might be in your future.

Can an implant be safe?

The decision to use implants for those metals poisoned can be a scary thought.  We worry about the possibility of more metals leaching toxicity into our bodies or the harboring of bacteria that can cause low-grade infections.

The reality is that most of us became poisoned through dentistry.  A mouthful of mercury laden, amalgam fillings usually means ongoing dental visits for repairs, removal and secondary fixes.  Emotionally  and financially we're drained.

In the end, the decision is yours and only your research will give you the answer.  I did my research and in the end chose a zirconium implant over titanium.  There was controversy among dentists and I will share that debate with you.

Both products are highly regarded.  Because titanium is stronger there is great cause to use them, especially in molars.  Zirconium does not have the strength of titanium, but it is a very successful product.

My IAOMT* dentist, who does not do implants was zirconium adamant.  My dentist doing the implant was in favor of titanium.  I finally asked why my IAOMT dentist preferred zirconium and he explained that although he does not install them, he does remove them for metals people who have shown a sensitivity to them.  
​That was Decision Made.

*An IAOMT dentist is a member of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.  They have committed to using clean dentistry and do not use mercury.  Their practices include the safe removal of mercury fillings.

   
​Counterfeit NBMI is still
​being sold as the real thing
    ​
                                   

Today I was send an article authored by Dr. Sircus, dated 11/12/19.  He published what appears to be a very comprehensive report on Dr. Boyd Haley's NBMI metals chelator.  After reading the article I contacted the company to verify some key points.  My personal conclusion is that this article, although highly factual, may very well be nothing more than an advertisement for counterfeit NBMI.  

Note:  NBMI has had several name changes over the years.  You may know it by Irminix, OSR or Emeramide.

The article states:
"Purchasing Information 
Dr. Boyd Haley’s NBMI is available for those contaminated by mercury and other heavy metals. As of this date, it is available for compassionate use only. The application process can be lengthy for some countries and in others it is very simple or unnecessary. The product is currently provided for free with a fee of $750 for application processing.

A less expensive source ships from the Far East and the United States. Their price for 5/10/20g is USD150/220/350. Mob./Whatsapp/Telegram: +86 186 6823 5107 https://www.fandachem.com/ Use of a sensitive scale is suggested with use.

It was a patient of mine who highly recommended this source and put me back in touch with Dr. Haley and his excellent research, after many years of being out of touch. The chelation area of medicine is highly controversial, competitive and confusing but now I feel absolutely confident I am presenting the best and safest chelator".

My Emeramed source from the Board of Directors clearly tells me that Dr. Haley does not know the author and that the product, is without doubt, counterfeit.  They have documented reports of side effects, of which NBMI has zero.

My question has always been, why isn't the FDA stopping the trafficking of the counterfeit product in the USA.  Here is the response from Emeramed.

"We have repeatedly asked the FDA to do their job, but so far they have refused. They say since the product is labeled not for human consumption they can not do anything.  Boyd (Dr. Haley) asked if he could sell his product with the same label and they said they would put him in jail.

The compound may or may not contain any active ingredient. Boyd (Dr. Haley)  does get calls or how to take it and why they got sick etc.  The Company was sent an adverse reaction report from a person in the EU, but when he inquired as the source of the product he found out they were having adverse reactions to the fake OSR not our compound which remains classified as an unapproved drug and has not had even a single serious adverse reaction reported."

The article by Dr. Sircus clearly endorses the counterfeit product.  To clarify and reinforce, this is not NBMI, OSR or any derivative of Emeramed's product.  What you've heard about the Emeramed product being sold from China is simply untrue.