Making health decisions in this current climate is difficult enough without conflicting 'truths,'
unreliable  statistics and efficacy reports supplied by manufacturer's of drugs you are expected to take without the benefit of conflicting opinions. 

​Feeling Alone?
                                                     You absolutely are not.  

Follow the link on this cryptic message to hear from global resources.  What you will find is that if you are resistant to the general medial propaganda, you represent about 50% of the global population.  Stay alert and firm.​

Reprinted as sent to me:

(Traduction en français disponible ici)
OCLA researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt and several fellow Canadian academics penned an open letter to support those who have decided not to accept the COVID-19 vaccine.
The group emphasizes the voluntary nature of this medical treatment as well as the need for informed consent and individual risk-benefit assessment. They reject the pressure exerted by public health officials, the news and social media, and fellow citizens.
Control over our bodily integrity may well be the ultimate frontier of the fight to protect civil liberties. Read the letter below or as a PDF here.
Open Letter to the Unvaccinated
You are not alone! As of 28 July 2021, 29% of Canadians have not received a COVID-19 vaccine, and an additional 14% have received one shot. In the US and in the European Union, less than half the population is fully vaccinated, and even in Israel, the “world’s lab” according to Pfizer, one third of people remain completely unvaccinated. Politicians and the media have taken a uniform view, scapegoating the unvaccinated for the troubles that have ensued after eighteen months of fearmongering and lockdowns. It’s time to set the record straight.
It is entirely reasonable and legitimate to say ‘no’ to insufficiently tested vaccines for which there is no reliable science. You have a right to assert guardianship of your body and to refuse medical treatments if you see fit. You are right to say ‘no’ to a violation of your dignity, your integrity and your bodily autonomy. It is your body, and you have the right to choose. You are right to fight for your children against their mass vaccination in school.
You are right to question whether free and informed consent is at all possible under present circumstances. Long-term effects are unknown. Transgenerational effects are unknown. Vaccine-induced deregulation of natural immunity is unknown. Potential harm is unknown as the adverse event reporting is delayed, incomplete and inconsistent between jurisdictions.
You are being targeted by mainstream media, government social engineering campaigns, unjust rules and policies, collaborating employers, and the social-media mob. You are being told that you are now the problem and that the world cannot get back to normal unless you get vaccinated. You are being viciously scapegoated by propaganda and pressured by others around you. Remember; there is nothing wrong with you.
You are inaccurately accused of being a factory for new SARS-CoV-2 variants, when in fact, according to leading scientists, your natural immune system generates immunity to multiple components of the virus. This will promote your protection against a vast range of viral variants and abrogates further spread to anyone else.
You are justified in demanding independent peer-reviewed studies, not funded by multinational pharmaceutical companies. All the peer-reviewed studies of short-term safety and short-term efficacy have been funded, organized, coordinated, and supported by these for-profit corporations; and none of the study data have been made public or available to researchers who don’t work for these companies.
You are right to question the preliminary vaccine trial results. The claimed high values of relative efficacy rely on small numbers of tenuously determined “infections.”  The studies were also not blind, where people giving the injections admittedly knew or could deduce whether they were injecting the experimental vaccine or the placebo. This is not acceptable scientific methodology for vaccine trials.
You are correct in your calls for a diversity of scientific opinions. Like in nature, we need a polyculture of information and its interpretations. And we don’t have that right now. Choosing not to take the vaccine is holding space for reason, transparency and accountability to emerge. You are right to ask, ‘What comes next when we give away authority over our own bodies?’
Do not be intimidated. You are showing resilience, integrity and grit. You are coming together in your communities, making plans to help one another and standing for scientific accountability and free speech, which are required for society to thrive. We are among many who stand with you.
Angela Durante, PhD
Denis Rancourt, PhD
Claus Rinner, PhD
Laurent Leduc, PhD
Donald Welsh, PhD
John Zwaagstra, PhD
Jan Vrbik, PhD
Valentina Capurri, PhD
Update: The letter has been shared widely on the Internet, and translated into several languages, including Albanian, Czech, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, and Thai.

I consider myself to be extremely careful about consuming poisons after nearly 40 years of dealing with metals toxicity, but when it came to buying a coffee maker I went right back to my old habits, never considering toxicity.  Although I did do extensive research, health was not a consideration until a savvy friend reminded me about the plastic parts in coffee makers and the dangers they can hold.  Even with the reminder, I failed to do the right research.  

I bought a $300 unit, hoping for the best when it came to the use of plastic parts.  Then, as soon as I opened the box, there it was, right inside the lid was the California Proposition 65 warning.  

If you are not from California you might not have heard of Proposition 65 and even if you are from California it may mean little to you.  Prop. 65, as it is called, involves higher standards for products and materials than the FDA requires.  This means that the amounts of poisons and toxicity is reduced if goods are sold in the State or it must carry a warning.  It is law only in California, but because manufacturers do not want to produce two types of goods, they often upgrade or tag all of their goods to comply with California law.  

The Prop. 65 warning on my new coffee maker says out loud, “Buy at Your Own Risk.”  Even though the FDA thinks you will be fine, the State of California does not.  Meeting California requirements does not mean that the item is non-toxic.   It means only that the levels of toxicity have been lowered below the federal regulations.  The warning itself tells you that the product exceeds even California limits.  Truthfully, neither set of regulations will keep you as safe as it should.

So what does the warning apply to in the world of coffee makers?  It is yet, unknown.  I wrote the manufacturer to ask precisely what aspect of the machine do not comply with California law.  It is not easy to get an answer to such a question and will likely take days or weeks for a response.  If you go this route, the response needs to be in writing.  If you are told that the manufacturer complies with all FDA regulations, you are in trouble.  That is completely unsatisfactory and to a metals contaminated person, that answer is as good as a no.  

Instead of waiting for the response, I’m making the grown up decision to return my luxury coffee maker because my health is a priority.  After years of illness, why would I intentionally put 2 to 4 cups of poison into my body each and every day?

If you are shopping, consider a few of these highlights of the decision making process.  All plastic parts contain toxicity.  This includes those plastic pods for single cup coffee makers.  Many will say they are BPA free and that is good because BPA is a known carcinogen.  The problem is that BPA was replace with a formula change and who knows what is in the replacement.  Heating plastic allows the toxicity to leach, so 180 degrees on plastic every day of your life might not be a great idea…even though everyone else is doing it.

Another concern is aluminum.  There is really no aluminum product that is fit for food service.  That includes aluminum foil and cans.   You are just giving Alzheimer’s the greatest of opportunities.

Then there is the issue of bacteria that can grow in coffee makers.  It never occurred to me, but it did to my savvy friend who knew that water lines can grow mold.  Then there are all of those dark, warm and wet spots that can easily harbor bacteria.  As it turns out there are studies that say your coffee pot and your bathroom might tie for bacteria growth.

Finally, there is coffee itself.  You really don’t need a dose of pesticide each and every day even if you are the picture of health.  Organic beans are the start of a safe cup of coffee.  

The options seem to be stainless steel and lead-free glass.  That means pour over models, presses and percolators.  
​No bells.  No whistles.