This is a reprint of a letter sent to me about the limited health information the public actually receives from the media.
The pending lawsuit hopes to make a difference.  Meanwhile...You Should Know.

Reprint:

It’s time the legacy media is held accountable for censorship and collusion to suppress the truth! 
Earlier this week, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed a first-of-its-kind, landmark antitrust lawsuit in an effort to protect freedom of speech and stop the deliberate, concerted efforts made by the legacy media, colluding with Big Tech, Big Pharma and the government, to suppress critical information. 
On Tuesday, RFK, Jr. appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight breaking news about this novel lawsuit filed on Jan. 10 against members of a partnership group of media conglomerates, the Trusted News Initiative (TNI). Members of the TNI include legacy media outlets:  the BBC, The Washington Post, Reuters and Associated Press, along with social media and tech giants — Twitter, Meta (Facebook/Instagram), Microsoft (LinkedIn) and Google (YouTube). 
This lawsuit is seeking damages totaling millions of dollars based on the collusive censorship of online health and political news publishers who dared to question the narrative relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine mandates and U.S. elections (such as the Hunter Biden laptop story). 
Dr. Ben Tapper, Dr. Joseph Mercola, independent news publisher and founder of The Gateway Pundit Jim Hoft, independent journalists Ben Swann and Erin Elizabeth Finn, independent news outlets TrialSite News and Creative Destruction Media and health-freedom activists Ty and Charlene Bollinger join Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and CHD as plaintiffs. 
These plaintiffs had combined followers of over 11 million — reaching billions of people with their content. 
The complaint explains, “The TNI was spearheaded by legacy news organizations, like the Defendants, fearful of what they themselves described as an ‘existential threat’ to their economic survival: the explosion online of thousands of new, rival sources of news threatening to take audience share away from traditional news organizations and to undermine consumers’ trust in those organizations.” 
The Devastating Impact of the Secret Media Cartel
These efforts to silence organizations like CHD, RFK, Jr. and the other plaintiffs in this lawsuit had disastrous effects. Suppression of truthful information related to safe and effective treatments, harms and risks of COVID shots and more deceived the public and destroyed their ability for informed consent. 
Due to the silencing of critical health information worldwide, millions of people suffered injuries and deaths, lost their jobs and had their livelihoods, businesses, families and health destroyed. 
Plaintiffs joined Wednesday’s Good Morning CHD, hosted by Aimee Villella McBride, to share the impacts of censorship on their businesses and news organizations, as well as on our democracy and the world at large. 
Thursday’s episode of Good Morning CHD, hosted by Mary Holland, J.D., featured CHD Chairman Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and attorney Jed Rubenfeld. The show delved deeper into the case, exploring how this first-of-its-kind lawsuit violates Americans’ First Amendment rights. 
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said: 
“My uncle, President Kennedy, and my father, the Attorney General, sought to prosecute antitrust laws that are still on the nation’s books with vigor. As private enforcers of those laws, we are confident that the Federal Court in Texas will vindicate our bedrock freedom to compete with legacy media in the marketplace of ideas.” 
Children’s Health Defense is committed to defending children’s health and preserving our fundamental rights. We will exert every effort to prevent the legacy media from destroying our democracy and the health and well-being of future generations. This novel lawsuit seeks to force accountability on the legacy media—admitting their conduct to be unlawful—and bring justice to the plaintiffs. 
In truth, 
The Team at Children’s Health Defense

​Some of the greatest warriors for our health
are forgotten because they are not high profile machines that take donations to feed lost causes. 
​
Finding the organizations that represent your interests takes a little time,
but the rewards are great.
​​

We give donations and we hope that are making a difference, but we don't always investigate how that money is spent or follow the progress of the organization.    If you really care about your health there are some organizations you might like to know better because they are attacking the systemic reasons for widespread illness.

These are a few that suit me and have my support for their on-going, established roles in making health and safety a priority by searching for the cause and NOT just the cure:

EWG or Environmental Working Group has stood strong to protect water, food, consumer products, agriculture, cosmetics and many other areas of needless toxicity.  They have forced change in corporate manufacturing, with the government and the FDA.  They produce the Skin Deep site that gives the health status of thousands of products.  You can learn more about them at ewg.org.

Think Dirty is a website at thinkdirty.com and also an app that you can use to rate product safety before you buy.  They have monitized their services by selling products of those manufacturers that they feel are safe and of value to the public.  

Breast Cancer Prevention Partners  doesn’t dress women up in pink or walk in the streets to support Big Pharma cancer research.  They have their sights focused on why cancer is in our lives.  They expose the truth about cancer causing agents in our foods, personal care products and more.  Find them at bcpp.org.

Breast Cancer Action is found at bca.org.  You will find them uninfluenced by the industry standards for breast cancer.  Their goal is to give women the truth about treatment, cause and action.

Children’s Health Defense  has grown out of Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s World Mercury Project.  The same leadership has extended the focus to stop not only the casual use of mercury and dangerous metals, but to protect medical rights and expose truth in our health services.  Reach them at childrenshealthdefense.org.
 

Making health decisions in this current climate is difficult enough without conflicting 'truths,'
unreliable  statistics and efficacy reports supplied by manufacturer's of drugs you are expected to take without the benefit of conflicting opinions. 

​Feeling Alone?
                                                     You absolutely are not.  

Follow the link on this cryptic message to hear from global resources.  What you will find is that if you are resistant to the general medial propaganda, you represent about 50% of the global population.  Stay alert and firm.​

Reprinted as sent to me:

(Traduction en français disponible ici)
OCLA researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt and several fellow Canadian academics penned an open letter to support those who have decided not to accept the COVID-19 vaccine.
The group emphasizes the voluntary nature of this medical treatment as well as the need for informed consent and individual risk-benefit assessment. They reject the pressure exerted by public health officials, the news and social media, and fellow citizens.
Control over our bodily integrity may well be the ultimate frontier of the fight to protect civil liberties. Read the letter below or as a PDF here.
Open Letter to the Unvaccinated
You are not alone! As of 28 July 2021, 29% of Canadians have not received a COVID-19 vaccine, and an additional 14% have received one shot. In the US and in the European Union, less than half the population is fully vaccinated, and even in Israel, the “world’s lab” according to Pfizer, one third of people remain completely unvaccinated. Politicians and the media have taken a uniform view, scapegoating the unvaccinated for the troubles that have ensued after eighteen months of fearmongering and lockdowns. It’s time to set the record straight.
It is entirely reasonable and legitimate to say ‘no’ to insufficiently tested vaccines for which there is no reliable science. You have a right to assert guardianship of your body and to refuse medical treatments if you see fit. You are right to say ‘no’ to a violation of your dignity, your integrity and your bodily autonomy. It is your body, and you have the right to choose. You are right to fight for your children against their mass vaccination in school.
You are right to question whether free and informed consent is at all possible under present circumstances. Long-term effects are unknown. Transgenerational effects are unknown. Vaccine-induced deregulation of natural immunity is unknown. Potential harm is unknown as the adverse event reporting is delayed, incomplete and inconsistent between jurisdictions.
You are being targeted by mainstream media, government social engineering campaigns, unjust rules and policies, collaborating employers, and the social-media mob. You are being told that you are now the problem and that the world cannot get back to normal unless you get vaccinated. You are being viciously scapegoated by propaganda and pressured by others around you. Remember; there is nothing wrong with you.
You are inaccurately accused of being a factory for new SARS-CoV-2 variants, when in fact, according to leading scientists, your natural immune system generates immunity to multiple components of the virus. This will promote your protection against a vast range of viral variants and abrogates further spread to anyone else.
You are justified in demanding independent peer-reviewed studies, not funded by multinational pharmaceutical companies. All the peer-reviewed studies of short-term safety and short-term efficacy have been funded, organized, coordinated, and supported by these for-profit corporations; and none of the study data have been made public or available to researchers who don’t work for these companies.
You are right to question the preliminary vaccine trial results. The claimed high values of relative efficacy rely on small numbers of tenuously determined “infections.”  The studies were also not blind, where people giving the injections admittedly knew or could deduce whether they were injecting the experimental vaccine or the placebo. This is not acceptable scientific methodology for vaccine trials.
You are correct in your calls for a diversity of scientific opinions. Like in nature, we need a polyculture of information and its interpretations. And we don’t have that right now. Choosing not to take the vaccine is holding space for reason, transparency and accountability to emerge. You are right to ask, ‘What comes next when we give away authority over our own bodies?’
Do not be intimidated. You are showing resilience, integrity and grit. You are coming together in your communities, making plans to help one another and standing for scientific accountability and free speech, which are required for society to thrive. We are among many who stand with you.
Angela Durante, PhD
Denis Rancourt, PhD
Claus Rinner, PhD
Laurent Leduc, PhD
Donald Welsh, PhD
John Zwaagstra, PhD
Jan Vrbik, PhD
Valentina Capurri, PhD
Update: The letter has been shared widely on the Internet, and translated into several languages, including Albanian, Czech, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, and Thai.