Remember when BPA in plastic drinking products became public news?  There was a mad rush by marketing experts to solve the problem of a cancer causing agent in your food.

The quickest way to accomplish that dilemma was to reformulate slightly and change the name to BPS.   Problem solved for manufacturers, but not so for consumers.

The new re-marketing of personal care products spills "paraben-free" on labels and usually adds something organic or an essential oil to make you believe the product has only your health and safety in mind.  So what is replacing dangerous parabens as they  leave the scene?  

The new "no paraben" additives are often being replaced casually by PHENOXYETHANOL.  Is it safer?  Who knows.  It does have known dangers and is discussed as being connected to reproductive damage, brain issues and disruptions to the nervous system.  

Like most dangerous elements, the government entities that you trust, have little to say about the dangers and few regulations.  They mention problematic issues, but rely on any one body only coming in contact with small doses.  The problem is that the use is now too wide spread to count on being only slightly affected.  Your skin absorbs into your body and daily use of several of these additives can be harmful.  They are like fertilizer for future illness.

​A little bit of poison in a lot of personal care products adds up to trouble.  Because phenoxyethanol is used as a perservative, you will find it in many shampoos, cosmetics and lotions.  Unfortunately, you will also find it in items claiming to be natural.  This means reading every item on a label is the only way to find truly clean products.  If you aren't curious enough to research anything you don't understand, you can use the "If I can't pronounce it, I don't buy it" method.

Adding to the winding road to discovery you will find this product under many names.  You may see it listed by these and more.  HYDROXYETHYL PHENYL ETHER, 2-PHENOXY- ETHANOL, 2-PHENOXYETHANOL, 2-PHENOXYETHYL ALCOHOL, ETHANOL, 2-PHENOXY-, ETHANOL, 2PHENOXY, ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOPHENYL ETHER, PHENOXYETHANOL, and PHENOXYTOL ... CPS&Q.

Newer material in on the bottom of this collection.

Virus Information is Being Censored

Believe it or not, there is more than one opinion about the 2020 virus situation.  Traditional news agencies report only one point of view which is reasonable when 90% of the advertising dollar in the US television marketplace is paid Big Pharma.  You never bite the hand that supplies the cash.  

Social media has also stepped in to remove and, refuse to allow anything they don't personally want heard.  Apparently what you cannot do is say that immunization may not be the way out of this, that masks might be the wrong choice, that Bill Gates might be dangerous or that parts of what we are being taught is not truth.

I'm posting what I can here so that we preserve some freedoms.  I post them not to change your mind for you, but to provide a platform where you can gather information to make up your own mind.

The Dr. Judy Mitcovich video, Plandemic, has been continuously removed from platforms like Facebook and YouTube.  You can watch it at 
​https://plandemicvideo.com.

This video has been banned over and over for not agreeing with the news media.  Decide for yourself, knowing that your right to opinions is being limited.

This video is Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai who tells you what you can do to boost your own immunity to all disease.  Apparently, this concept is out of bounds for traditional medicine, Big Pharma or television news.  Dr. Shiva is running for US Senate.

Federal and OSHA recommendations say the Mask does not protect and is not mandatory.  

Below is a copy of the letter I wrote to my municipal water board.  You may feel free to copy and send it to yours.  Instead of stirring up the same old question of "is  fluoride safe or unsafe" I've brought up some issues that are hard to dispute.  

Bottom line...The FDA classifies fluoride as an "unapproved drug," even though it has been used for 60 years.  We know the position of the Center for Disease Control is that systemic use of fluoride does no good and that only a topical treatment shows any signs of improving dental health.  We also know that there are changes to the body when fluoride is used.  How then did this happen?   Somewhere in my soul, it feels like greed is involved.

Copy of my letter to my water district:

This short fact sheet gives an overview of my concerns and those of others who question the efficacy, the dangers and the “why” of adding fluoride to our water supply.  It is time to re-examine that decision.

Of course there is science on all sides of this issue that will conflict, but we must question the policy.  Without getting into the arguable science, I have listed a few points that don’t require opinion.  Should you like more scientific data, I am happy to provide it.

Fluoride Facts;

1.  Fluoride is added to the water, not for the purpose of improving water quality, but rather for the alleged purpose of preventing tooth decay.  The FDA qualifies the use of fluoride for this purpose as a drug.  

We are therefore drugging unsuspecting users without informed consent.  This is not legal.  Many are exposed against their will.  Filtering drinking water is not the answer as showering and other uses are exposing humans to the drug.

 2. The use of fluoride is not universally accepted.  Most of Western Europe has refused fluoride because of the controversy surrounding it and the concept of mass drugging.

3.  If in fact fluoridation was a positive influence, water is not the correct method for dosing.  People consume water based on need of the water itself and without regard to the amount of the drug being consumed.  

It is easy to see that the amount of fluoride taken into a body cannot be regulated via the municipal water supply.  We must be able to calculate the amount of fluoride that is absorbed during showering via the skin or through crop watering which is impossible for a user.  We must also consider a bottle fed infant that ingests levels of fluoride equal to those of an adult.  There is no research to warn what the outcome of this might be in the future.

4.  According to fluoridealert.com, fluoride is not an essential nutrient and no disease or tooth decay is caused by the lack of fluoride.  They also state that fluoride interferes with many enzymes and biological processes in the body.  They quote many studies that prove fluoride interferes with the body’s biochemistry in fundamental ways.

5.  In 60 years of forced fluoridation there are still no studies to prove efficacy or safety and still the  FDA classifies it as an “unapproved new drug.”  This should make the addition of fluoride without consent a criminal act.  

Although rather unscientific, I would also say that not one dentist has gone out of business because of fluoridated water.   There is no apparent threat to the dental industry and no data that proves dwindling numbers of patients.

6.  In 2001 the CDC concluded that the benefits of fluoride were topical and not systemic.  With this in mind, why are we risking what could be a horrific outcome?

7.  Studies of those fluoridated in comparison to those not fluoridated, show that each group has similar dental health in my research.  Even the NIH has studied fluoride and determined that there is no significant relationship between tooth decay and fluoride among children.

8.  Research shows that tooth decay does not increase when fluoridation is discontinued.

9.  Many resources agree that the studies that brought us fluoridation were flawed.  There is consistent evidence of potential harm and many resources, including the National Research Council, believe it may damage the brain.

10. Thirty-three independent studies from countries other than the USA report that exposure to fluoride will lower IQ.  Other studies focus on damage to the pineal gland, thyroid function, arthritis, bone density loss, kidney damage, bone cancer and infertility with fluoride contamination.

Is this not enough to ask yourself why we continue this practice?
I am asking this Board to reconsider our use of fluoride in the water supply and to ask that we begin purchasing non-fluoridated water. 

                        When you have the option of
                                  keeping baby safe 

​                                       Why Not?